Constant Contact and Brevo Email Deliverability Comparison
In this comparison, the deliverability of Constant Contact and Brevo is compared in detail. All available data, taking the filters into account, is used for the comparison.
Email deliverability
This comparison compares the numbers for sent emails, you can also see in which folder the emails at the email service provider ended up and how many emails were lost on the way. The numbers look better for Brevo than for Constant Contact.
| Emails Sent | Emails Inbox | Emails Spam | Emails Lost |
|---|---|---|---|
|
63.973
65.068
|
50.112
51.364
|
12.784
12.830
|
1.666
1.406
|
Email deliverability rates
The following table shows the most important deliverability rates (in percent) for the compared providers. The higher the inbox rate and the lower the spam rate, the better. Brevo beats Constant Contact in this comparison.
| Inbox (%) | Spam (%) | Lost (%) |
|---|---|---|
|
78.33 %
78.94 %
|
19.98 %
19.72 %
|
2.60 %
2.16 %
|
Email deliverability by category
This comparison compares the deliverability taking into account the category or the industry. The deliverability can vary greatly depending on the industry. In this comparison, Brevo is the clear winner.
| Category | Emails Sent | Emails Inbox | Emails Spam | Emails Lost | Inbox (%) | Spam (%) | Lost (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clothing |
4680
4918
|
3647
3866
|
974
991
|
124
100
|
77.93 %
78.61 %
|
20.81 %
20.15 %
|
2.65 %
2.03 %
|
| Elektronics |
4774
5108
|
3773
4072
|
914
959
|
123
111
|
79.03 %
79.72 %
|
19.15 %
18.77 %
|
2.58 %
2.17 %
|
| Entertainment |
5102
4998
|
3988
3906
|
1000
1030
|
132
107
|
78.17 %
78.15 %
|
19.60 %
20.61 %
|
2.59 %
2.14 %
|
| Cosmetics & Beauty |
4883
4918
|
3826
3916
|
990
937
|
129
107
|
78.35 %
79.63 %
|
20.27 %
19.05 %
|
2.64 %
2.18 %
|
| Food & Drink |
4863
4946
|
3797
3896
|
1008
1000
|
118
107
|
78.08 %
78.77 %
|
20.73 %
20.22 %
|
2.43 %
2.16 %
|
| Home & Garden |
4976
5130
|
3888
4022
|
1016
1037
|
127
111
|
78.14 %
78.40 %
|
20.42 %
20.21 %
|
2.55 %
2.16 %
|
| Finance |
4956
4974
|
4015
4052
|
842
862
|
140
106
|
81.01 %
81.46 %
|
16.99 %
17.33 %
|
2.82 %
2.13 %
|
| Health |
4983
5111
|
4004
4147
|
896
884
|
132
120
|
80.35 %
81.14 %
|
17.98 %
17.30 %
|
2.65 %
2.35 %
|
| Pets |
4968
4854
|
3895
3792
|
981
979
|
132
101
|
78.40 %
78.12 %
|
19.75 %
20.17 %
|
2.66 %
2.08 %
|
| Sport & Fitness |
4949
5130
|
3848
4034
|
1006
1027
|
133
114
|
77.75 %
78.64 %
|
20.33 %
20.02 %
|
2.69 %
2.22 %
|
| Job & Career |
5031
5083
|
3865
3906
|
1084
1109
|
130
113
|
76.82 %
76.84 %
|
21.55 %
21.82 %
|
2.58 %
2.22 %
|
| Dating |
4880
5012
|
3655
3839
|
1140
1113
|
122
98
|
74.90 %
76.60 %
|
23.36 %
22.21 %
|
2.50 %
1.96 %
|
| Other |
4928
4886
|
3911
3916
|
933
902
|
124
111
|
79.36 %
80.15 %
|
18.93 %
18.46 %
|
2.52 %
2.27 %
|
Email deliverability by email service provider
Finally, the following table compares the deliverability taking into account the email service provider. Similar to the industry, also the email service provider can affect the email deliverability in both directions — positive or negative. In this comparison, Brevo is better than Constant Contact.
| Provider | Emails Sent | Emails Inbox | Emails Spam | Emails Lost | Inbox (%) | Spam (%) | Lost (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gmail |
4709
4718
|
3594
3613
|
1032
1060
|
117
103
|
76.32 %
76.58 %
|
21.92 %
22.47 %
|
2.48 %
2.18 %
|
| Outlook Mail |
4505
4782
|
3463
3723
|
966
1000
|
120
93
|
76.87 %
77.85 %
|
21.44 %
20.91 %
|
2.66 %
1.94 %
|
| Yahoo Mail |
4762
4745
|
3699
3724
|
1007
972
|
124
102
|
77.68 %
78.48 %
|
21.15 %
20.48 %
|
2.60 %
2.15 %
|
| AOL Mail |
4603
4674
|
3576
3671
|
946
928
|
121
105
|
77.69 %
78.54 %
|
20.55 %
19.85 %
|
2.63 %
2.25 %
|
| Mail.com |
4887
4983
|
3873
3975
|
937
928
|
128
114
|
79.25 %
79.77 %
|
19.17 %
18.62 %
|
2.62 %
2.29 %
|
| Yandex Mail |
4565
4814
|
3565
3774
|
953
993
|
126
107
|
78.09 %
78.40 %
|
20.88 %
20.63 %
|
2.76 %
2.22 %
|
| GMX Mail |
4561
4634
|
3484
3587
|
986
975
|
115
103
|
76.39 %
77.41 %
|
21.62 %
21.04 %
|
2.52 %
2.22 %
|
| Zoho Mail |
4795
4705
|
3814
3768
|
899
870
|
127
101
|
79.54 %
80.09 %
|
18.75 %
18.49 %
|
2.65 %
2.15 %
|
| ProtonMail |
4616
4758
|
3720
3827
|
833
870
|
116
111
|
80.59 %
80.43 %
|
18.05 %
18.28 %
|
2.51 %
2.33 %
|
| Custom Mail |
4732
4799
|
3784
3887
|
865
845
|
126
100
|
79.97 %
81.00 %
|
18.28 %
17.61 %
|
2.66 %
2.08 %
|
| iCloud Mail |
4639
5008
|
3554
3825
|
1020
1104
|
125
110
|
76.61 %
76.38 %
|
21.99 %
22.04 %
|
2.69 %
2.20 %
|
| Tuta |
4582
4715
|
3641
3786
|
861
870
|
117
96
|
79.46 %
80.30 %
|
18.79 %
18.45 %
|
2.55 %
2.04 %
|
| Juno.com |
4724
4721
|
3767
3792
|
848
875
|
120
101
|
79.74 %
80.32 %
|
17.95 %
18.53 %
|
2.54 %
2.14 %
|
| Mailfence |
3293
3012
|
2578
2412
|
631
540
|
84
60
|
78.29 %
80.08 %
|
19.16 %
17.93 %
|
2.55 %
1.99 %
|
Compare Constant Contact with other providers
Compare the email deliverability of Constant Contact with other providers.
- Constant Contact and ActiveCampaign comparison
- Constant Contact and Amazon SES comparison
- Constant Contact and AWeber comparison
- Constant Contact and Benchmark Email comparison
- Constant Contact and Brevo comparison
- Constant Contact and CampaignMonitor comparison
- Constant Contact and Clever Elements comparison
- Constant Contact and CleverReach comparison
- Constant Contact and ConvertKit comparison
- Constant Contact and GetResponse comparison
- Constant Contact and HubSpot comparison
- Constant Contact and Kit comparison
- Constant Contact and Klick-Tipp comparison
- Constant Contact and MailChimp comparison
- Constant Contact and MailerLite comparison
- Constant Contact and Mailgun comparison
- Constant Contact and Mailify comparison
- Constant Contact and Mailjet comparison
- Constant Contact and mailtrap comparison
- Constant Contact and Moosend comparison
- Constant Contact and Newsletter2Go comparison
- Constant Contact and Postmark comparison
- Constant Contact and Rapidmail comparison
- Constant Contact and Sarbacane comparison
- Constant Contact and SendGrid comparison
- Constant Contact and SendInBlue comparison
- Constant Contact and SendPulse comparison
Deutsch
English
Русский