CampaignMonitor and Postmark Email Deliverability Comparison
In this comparison, the deliverability of CampaignMonitor and Postmark is compared in detail. All available data, taking the filters into account, is used for the comparison.
Email deliverability
This comparison compares the numbers for sent emails, you can also see in which folder the emails at the email service provider ended up and how many emails were lost on the way. The numbers look better for Postmark than for CampaignMonitor.
| Emails Sent | Emails Inbox | Emails Spam | Emails Lost |
|---|---|---|---|
|
63.889
63.445
|
50.007
50.822
|
12.907
11.778
|
1.400
1.354
|
Email deliverability rates
The following table shows the most important deliverability rates (in percent) for the compared providers. The higher the inbox rate and the lower the spam rate, the better. Postmark beats CampaignMonitor in this comparison.
| Inbox (%) | Spam (%) | Lost (%) |
|---|---|---|
|
78.27 %
80.10 %
|
20.20 %
18.56 %
|
2.19 %
2.13 %
|
Email deliverability by category
This comparison compares the deliverability taking into account the category or the industry. The deliverability can vary greatly depending on the industry. In this comparison, Postmark is the clear winner.
| Category | Emails Sent | Emails Inbox | Emails Spam | Emails Lost | Inbox (%) | Spam (%) | Lost (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clothing |
5227
4784
|
4110
3827
|
1055
896
|
115
102
|
78.63 %
80.00 %
|
20.18 %
18.73 %
|
2.20 %
2.13 %
|
| Elektronics |
5047
4743
|
3909
3808
|
1037
875
|
107
101
|
77.45 %
80.29 %
|
20.55 %
18.45 %
|
2.12 %
2.13 %
|
| Entertainment |
4880
5083
|
3801
4042
|
959
963
|
101
120
|
77.89 %
79.52 %
|
19.65 %
18.95 %
|
2.07 %
2.36 %
|
| Cosmetics & Beauty |
4956
4728
|
3932
3806
|
968
876
|
105
96
|
79.34 %
80.50 %
|
19.53 %
18.53 %
|
2.12 %
2.03 %
|
| Food & Drink |
4941
4798
|
3836
3836
|
1023
913
|
106
93
|
77.64 %
79.95 %
|
20.70 %
19.03 %
|
2.15 %
1.94 %
|
| Home & Garden |
4849
4796
|
3782
3857
|
1024
863
|
108
104
|
78.00 %
80.42 %
|
21.12 %
17.99 %
|
2.23 %
2.17 %
|
| Finance |
4989
4978
|
4007
4085
|
914
845
|
116
103
|
80.32 %
82.06 %
|
18.32 %
16.97 %
|
2.33 %
2.07 %
|
| Health |
4749
4709
|
3852
3895
|
833
721
|
105
98
|
81.11 %
82.71 %
|
17.54 %
15.31 %
|
2.21 %
2.08 %
|
| Pets |
4871
4983
|
3794
3962
|
1001
938
|
112
113
|
77.89 %
79.51 %
|
20.55 %
18.82 %
|
2.30 %
2.27 %
|
| Sport & Fitness |
5068
5096
|
3929
4048
|
1047
976
|
108
108
|
77.53 %
79.43 %
|
20.66 %
19.15 %
|
2.13 %
2.12 %
|
| Job & Career |
4707
4854
|
3617
3814
|
1015
983
|
107
101
|
76.84 %
78.57 %
|
21.56 %
20.25 %
|
2.27 %
2.08 %
|
| Dating |
4857
4857
|
3680
3741
|
1104
1049
|
111
103
|
75.77 %
77.02 %
|
22.73 %
21.60 %
|
2.29 %
2.12 %
|
| Other |
4748
5036
|
3758
4101
|
927
880
|
99
112
|
79.15 %
81.43 %
|
19.52 %
17.47 %
|
2.09 %
2.22 %
|
Email deliverability by email service provider
Finally, the following table compares the deliverability taking into account the email service provider. Similar to the industry, also the email service provider can affect the email deliverability in both directions — positive or negative. In this comparison, Postmark is better than CampaignMonitor.
| Provider | Emails Sent | Emails Inbox | Emails Spam | Emails Lost | Inbox (%) | Spam (%) | Lost (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gmail |
4456
4638
|
3380
3591
|
1011
1000
|
96
93
|
75.85 %
77.43 %
|
22.69 %
21.56 %
|
2.15 %
2.01 %
|
| Outlook Mail |
4614
4562
|
3544
3585
|
1000
909
|
108
101
|
76.81 %
78.58 %
|
21.67 %
19.93 %
|
2.34 %
2.21 %
|
| Yahoo Mail |
4702
4625
|
3633
3657
|
965
908
|
101
101
|
77.26 %
79.07 %
|
20.52 %
19.63 %
|
2.15 %
2.18 %
|
| AOL Mail |
4805
4633
|
3702
3688
|
1019
873
|
105
95
|
77.04 %
79.60 %
|
21.21 %
18.84 %
|
2.19 %
2.05 %
|
| Mail.com |
4686
4620
|
3685
3772
|
921
766
|
95
97
|
78.64 %
81.65 %
|
19.65 %
16.58 %
|
2.03 %
2.10 %
|
| Yandex Mail |
4614
4706
|
3602
3758
|
971
882
|
98
101
|
78.07 %
79.86 %
|
21.04 %
18.74 %
|
2.12 %
2.15 %
|
| GMX Mail |
4668
4690
|
3609
3679
|
973
928
|
97
111
|
77.31 %
78.44 %
|
20.84 %
19.79 %
|
2.08 %
2.37 %
|
| Zoho Mail |
4755
4704
|
3801
3835
|
894
817
|
104
99
|
79.94 %
81.53 %
|
18.80 %
17.37 %
|
2.19 %
2.10 %
|
| ProtonMail |
4645
4536
|
3715
3702
|
880
801
|
106
94
|
79.98 %
81.61 %
|
18.95 %
17.66 %
|
2.28 %
2.07 %
|
| Custom Mail |
4689
4667
|
3784
3866
|
846
748
|
101
103
|
80.70 %
82.84 %
|
18.04 %
16.03 %
|
2.15 %
2.21 %
|
| iCloud Mail |
4709
4614
|
3565
3582
|
1068
966
|
107
99
|
75.71 %
77.63 %
|
22.68 %
20.94 %
|
2.27 %
2.15 %
|
| Tuta |
4776
4645
|
3789
3785
|
916
801
|
104
99
|
79.33 %
81.49 %
|
19.18 %
17.24 %
|
2.18 %
2.13 %
|
| Juno.com |
4787
4779
|
3838
3901
|
885
834
|
113
101
|
80.18 %
81.63 %
|
18.49 %
17.45 %
|
2.36 %
2.11 %
|
| Mailfence |
2983
3026
|
2360
2421
|
558
545
|
65
60
|
79.11 %
80.01 %
|
18.71 %
18.01 %
|
2.18 %
1.98 %
|
Compare CampaignMonitor with other providers
Compare the email deliverability of CampaignMonitor with other providers.
- CampaignMonitor and ActiveCampaign comparison
- CampaignMonitor and Amazon SES comparison
- CampaignMonitor and AWeber comparison
- CampaignMonitor and Benchmark Email comparison
- CampaignMonitor and Brevo comparison
- CampaignMonitor and Clever Elements comparison
- CampaignMonitor and CleverReach comparison
- CampaignMonitor and Constant Contact comparison
- CampaignMonitor and ConvertKit comparison
- CampaignMonitor and GetResponse comparison
- CampaignMonitor and HubSpot comparison
- CampaignMonitor and Kit comparison
- CampaignMonitor and Klick-Tipp comparison
- CampaignMonitor and MailChimp comparison
- CampaignMonitor and MailerLite comparison
- CampaignMonitor and Mailgun comparison
- CampaignMonitor and Mailify comparison
- CampaignMonitor and Mailjet comparison
- CampaignMonitor and mailtrap comparison
- CampaignMonitor and Moosend comparison
- CampaignMonitor and Newsletter2Go comparison
- CampaignMonitor and Postmark comparison
- CampaignMonitor and Rapidmail comparison
- CampaignMonitor and Sarbacane comparison
- CampaignMonitor and SendGrid comparison
- CampaignMonitor and SendInBlue comparison
- CampaignMonitor and SendPulse comparison
Deutsch
English
Русский