CampaignMonitor and MailerLite Email Deliverability Comparison
In this comparison, the deliverability of CampaignMonitor and MailerLite is compared in detail. All available data, taking the filters into account, is used for the comparison.
Email deliverability
This comparison compares the numbers for sent emails, you can also see in which folder the emails at the email service provider ended up and how many emails were lost on the way. The numbers look better for CampaignMonitor than for MailerLite.
Emails Sent | Emails Inbox | Emails Spam | Emails Lost |
---|---|---|---|
464.081
464.086
|
373.355
350.548
|
76.993
95.358
|
13.733
18.180
|
Email deliverability rates
The following table shows the most important deliverability rates (in percent) for the compared providers. The higher the inbox rate and the lower the spam rate, the better. CampaignMonitor beats MailerLite in this comparison.
Inbox (%) | Spam (%) | Lost (%) |
---|---|---|
80.45 %
75.54 %
|
16.59 %
20.55 %
|
2.96 %
3.92 %
|
Email deliverability by category
This comparison compares the deliverability taking into account the category or the industry. The deliverability can vary greatly depending on the industry. In this comparison, CampaignMonitor is the clear winner.
Category | Emails Sent | Emails Inbox | Emails Spam | Emails Lost | Inbox (%) | Spam (%) | Lost (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Clothing |
35623
35672
|
29781
27961
|
4945
6451
|
897
1260
|
83.60 %
78.38 %
|
13.88 %
18.08 %
|
2.52 %
3.53 %
|
Elektronics |
35767
35120
|
29028
26831
|
5730
6939
|
1009
1350
|
81.16 %
76.40 %
|
16.02 %
19.76 %
|
2.82 %
3.84 %
|
Entertainment |
35821
35392
|
28808
26791
|
6008
7296
|
1005
1305
|
80.42 %
75.70 %
|
16.77 %
20.61 %
|
2.81 %
3.69 %
|
Cosmetics & Beauty |
35706
35992
|
28569
27069
|
6047
7485
|
1090
1438
|
80.01 %
75.21 %
|
16.94 %
20.80 %
|
3.05 %
4.00 %
|
Food & Drink |
36169
35937
|
30110
28143
|
5105
6513
|
954
1281
|
83.25 %
78.31 %
|
14.11 %
18.12 %
|
2.64 %
3.56 %
|
Home & Garden |
35559
35768
|
29674
28057
|
4957
6402
|
928
1309
|
83.45 %
78.44 %
|
13.94 %
17.90 %
|
2.61 %
3.66 %
|
Finance |
35538
36237
|
27428
26131
|
6914
8496
|
1196
1610
|
77.18 %
72.11 %
|
19.46 %
23.45 %
|
3.37 %
4.44 %
|
Health |
35835
35861
|
28002
26256
|
6684
8174
|
1149
1431
|
78.14 %
73.22 %
|
18.65 %
22.79 %
|
3.21 %
3.99 %
|
Pets |
35802
35725
|
29440
27690
|
5315
6719
|
1047
1316
|
82.23 %
77.51 %
|
14.85 %
18.81 %
|
2.92 %
3.68 %
|
Sport & Fitness |
35733
35735
|
28361
26553
|
6227
7746
|
1145
1436
|
79.37 %
74.31 %
|
17.43 %
21.68 %
|
3.20 %
4.02 %
|
Job & Career |
35319
35825
|
27703
26352
|
6443
7956
|
1173
1517
|
78.44 %
73.56 %
|
18.24 %
22.21 %
|
3.32 %
4.23 %
|
Dating |
35660
35402
|
27157
25218
|
7389
8596
|
1114
1588
|
76.16 %
71.23 %
|
20.72 %
24.28 %
|
3.12 %
4.49 %
|
Other |
35549
35420
|
29294
27496
|
5229
6585
|
1026
1339
|
82.40 %
77.63 %
|
14.71 %
18.59 %
|
2.89 %
3.78 %
|
Email deliverability by email service provider
Finally, the following table compares the deliverability taking into account the email service provider. Similar to the industry, also the email service provider can affect the email deliverability in both directions – positive or negative. In this comparison, CampaignMonitor is better than MailerLite.
Provider | Emails Sent | Emails Inbox | Emails Spam | Emails Lost | Inbox (%) | Spam (%) | Lost (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gmail |
45163
44744
|
34608
32175
|
9034
10586
|
1521
1983
|
76.63 %
71.91 %
|
20.00 %
23.66 %
|
3.37 %
4.43 %
|
Outlook Mail |
44645
45008
|
34812
32889
|
8371
10246
|
1462
1873
|
77.98 %
73.07 %
|
18.75 %
22.76 %
|
3.27 %
4.16 %
|
Yahoo Mail |
44880
44729
|
35946
33546
|
7602
9362
|
1332
1821
|
80.09 %
75.00 %
|
16.94 %
20.93 %
|
2.97 %
4.07 %
|
AOL Mail |
44385
44548
|
35519
33471
|
7496
9329
|
1370
1748
|
80.02 %
75.13 %
|
16.89 %
20.94 %
|
3.09 %
3.92 %
|
Mail.com |
44707
44909
|
36411
34208
|
7052
8958
|
1244
1743
|
81.44 %
76.17 %
|
15.77 %
19.95 %
|
2.78 %
3.88 %
|
Yandex Mail |
44914
44352
|
35290
32756
|
8152
9773
|
1472
1823
|
78.57 %
73.85 %
|
18.15 %
22.04 %
|
3.28 %
4.11 %
|
GMX Mail |
44247
44905
|
35877
34287
|
7137
9010
|
1233
1608
|
81.08 %
76.35 %
|
16.13 %
20.06 %
|
2.79 %
3.58 %
|
Zoho Mail |
45051
44739
|
36950
34627
|
6880
8495
|
1221
1617
|
82.02 %
77.40 %
|
15.27 %
18.99 %
|
2.71 %
3.61 %
|
ProtonMail |
45465
44907
|
37389
34752
|
6923
8606
|
1153
1549
|
82.24 %
77.39 %
|
15.23 %
19.16 %
|
2.54 %
3.45 %
|
Custom Mail |
44259
45066
|
36897
35291
|
6226
8179
|
1136
1596
|
83.37 %
78.31 %
|
14.07 %
18.15 %
|
2.57 %
3.54 %
|
iCloud Mail |
5457
5372
|
4283
3908
|
907
1137
|
267
327
|
78.49 %
72.75 %
|
16.62 %
21.17 %
|
4.89 %
6.09 %
|
Tuta |
5594
5467
|
4785
4367
|
644
865
|
165
235
|
85.54 %
79.88 %
|
11.51 %
15.82 %
|
2.95 %
4.30 %
|
Juno.com |
5314
5340
|
4588
4271
|
569
812
|
157
257
|
86.34 %
79.98 %
|
10.71 %
15.21 %
|
2.95 %
4.81 %
|
Compare CampaignMonitor with other providers
Compare the email deliverability of CampaignMonitor with other providers.
- CampaignMonitor and ActiveCampaign comparison
- CampaignMonitor and Amazon SES comparison
- CampaignMonitor and AWeber comparison
- CampaignMonitor and Benchmark Email comparison
- CampaignMonitor and Brevo comparison
- CampaignMonitor and Clever Elements comparison
- CampaignMonitor and CleverReach comparison
- CampaignMonitor and Constant Contact comparison
- CampaignMonitor and ConvertKit comparison
- CampaignMonitor and GetResponse comparison
- CampaignMonitor and HubSpot comparison
- CampaignMonitor and Kit comparison
- CampaignMonitor and Klick-Tipp comparison
- CampaignMonitor and MailChimp comparison
- CampaignMonitor and MailerLite comparison
- CampaignMonitor and Mailgun comparison
- CampaignMonitor and Mailify comparison
- CampaignMonitor and Mailjet comparison
- CampaignMonitor and mailtrap comparison
- CampaignMonitor and Moosend comparison
- CampaignMonitor and Newsletter2Go comparison
- CampaignMonitor and Postmark comparison
- CampaignMonitor and Rapidmail comparison
- CampaignMonitor and Sarbacane comparison
- CampaignMonitor and SendGrid comparison
- CampaignMonitor and SendInBlue comparison
- CampaignMonitor and SendPulse comparison