CampaignMonitor and Benchmark Email Email Deliverability Comparison
In this comparison, the deliverability of CampaignMonitor and Benchmark Email is compared in detail. All available data, taking the filters into account, is used for the comparison.
Email deliverability
This comparison compares the numbers for sent emails, you can also see in which folder the emails at the email service provider ended up and how many emails were lost on the way. The numbers look better for Benchmark Email than for CampaignMonitor.
| Emails Sent | Emails Inbox | Emails Spam | Emails Lost |
|---|---|---|---|
|
63.889
64.256
|
50.007
51.984
|
12.907
11.432
|
1.400
1.289
|
Email deliverability rates
The following table shows the most important deliverability rates (in percent) for the compared providers. The higher the inbox rate and the lower the spam rate, the better. Benchmark Email beats CampaignMonitor in this comparison.
| Inbox (%) | Spam (%) | Lost (%) |
|---|---|---|
|
78.27 %
80.90 %
|
20.20 %
17.79 %
|
2.19 %
2.01 %
|
Email deliverability by category
This comparison compares the deliverability taking into account the category or the industry. The deliverability can vary greatly depending on the industry. In this comparison, Benchmark Email is the clear winner.
| Category | Emails Sent | Emails Inbox | Emails Spam | Emails Lost | Inbox (%) | Spam (%) | Lost (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clothing |
5227
5017
|
4110
3990
|
1055
947
|
115
97
|
78.63 %
79.53 %
|
20.18 %
18.88 %
|
2.20 %
1.93 %
|
| Elektronics |
5047
4959
|
3909
4054
|
1037
838
|
107
112
|
77.45 %
81.75 %
|
20.55 %
16.90 %
|
2.12 %
2.26 %
|
| Entertainment |
4880
5054
|
3801
4088
|
959
905
|
101
100
|
77.89 %
80.89 %
|
19.65 %
17.91 %
|
2.07 %
1.98 %
|
| Cosmetics & Beauty |
4956
4874
|
3932
3977
|
968
852
|
105
96
|
79.34 %
81.60 %
|
19.53 %
17.48 %
|
2.12 %
1.97 %
|
| Food & Drink |
4941
4756
|
3836
3832
|
1023
873
|
106
99
|
77.64 %
80.57 %
|
20.70 %
18.36 %
|
2.15 %
2.08 %
|
| Home & Garden |
4849
4986
|
3782
4050
|
1024
881
|
108
103
|
78.00 %
81.23 %
|
21.12 %
17.67 %
|
2.23 %
2.07 %
|
| Finance |
4989
4816
|
4007
3968
|
914
772
|
116
107
|
80.32 %
82.39 %
|
18.32 %
16.03 %
|
2.33 %
2.22 %
|
| Health |
4749
4962
|
3852
4116
|
833
768
|
105
90
|
81.11 %
82.95 %
|
17.54 %
15.48 %
|
2.21 %
1.81 %
|
| Pets |
4871
5128
|
3794
4149
|
1001
903
|
112
97
|
77.89 %
80.91 %
|
20.55 %
17.61 %
|
2.30 %
1.89 %
|
| Sport & Fitness |
5068
4893
|
3929
3945
|
1047
878
|
108
92
|
77.53 %
80.63 %
|
20.66 %
17.94 %
|
2.13 %
1.88 %
|
| Job & Career |
4707
4916
|
3617
3906
|
1015
949
|
107
104
|
76.84 %
79.45 %
|
21.56 %
19.30 %
|
2.27 %
2.12 %
|
| Dating |
4857
4920
|
3680
3850
|
1104
1022
|
111
94
|
75.77 %
78.25 %
|
22.73 %
20.77 %
|
2.29 %
1.91 %
|
| Other |
4748
4975
|
3758
4059
|
927
844
|
99
98
|
79.15 %
81.59 %
|
19.52 %
16.96 %
|
2.09 %
1.97 %
|
Email deliverability by email service provider
Finally, the following table compares the deliverability taking into account the email service provider. Similar to the industry, also the email service provider can affect the email deliverability in both directions — positive or negative. In this comparison, Benchmark Email is better than CampaignMonitor.
| Provider | Emails Sent | Emails Inbox | Emails Spam | Emails Lost | Inbox (%) | Spam (%) | Lost (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gmail |
4456
4670
|
3380
3698
|
1011
936
|
96
91
|
75.85 %
79.19 %
|
22.69 %
20.04 %
|
2.15 %
1.95 %
|
| Outlook Mail |
4614
4924
|
3544
3941
|
1000
926
|
108
96
|
76.81 %
80.04 %
|
21.67 %
18.81 %
|
2.34 %
1.95 %
|
| Yahoo Mail |
4702
4688
|
3633
3774
|
965
856
|
101
95
|
77.26 %
80.50 %
|
20.52 %
18.26 %
|
2.15 %
2.03 %
|
| AOL Mail |
4805
4499
|
3702
3634
|
1019
807
|
105
92
|
77.04 %
80.77 %
|
21.21 %
17.94 %
|
2.19 %
2.04 %
|
| Mail.com |
4686
4687
|
3685
3838
|
921
802
|
95
95
|
78.64 %
81.89 %
|
19.65 %
17.11 %
|
2.03 %
2.03 %
|
| Yandex Mail |
4614
4988
|
3602
4005
|
971
898
|
98
97
|
78.07 %
80.29 %
|
21.04 %
18.00 %
|
2.12 %
1.94 %
|
| GMX Mail |
4668
4755
|
3609
3794
|
973
931
|
97
89
|
77.31 %
79.79 %
|
20.84 %
19.58 %
|
2.08 %
1.87 %
|
| Zoho Mail |
4755
4609
|
3801
3770
|
894
755
|
104
97
|
79.94 %
81.80 %
|
18.80 %
16.38 %
|
2.19 %
2.10 %
|
| ProtonMail |
4645
4768
|
3715
3915
|
880
781
|
106
101
|
79.98 %
82.11 %
|
18.95 %
16.38 %
|
2.28 %
2.12 %
|
| Custom Mail |
4689
4523
|
3784
3760
|
846
699
|
101
86
|
80.70 %
83.13 %
|
18.04 %
15.45 %
|
2.15 %
1.90 %
|
| iCloud Mail |
4709
4757
|
3565
3732
|
1068
977
|
107
100
|
75.71 %
78.45 %
|
22.68 %
20.54 %
|
2.27 %
2.10 %
|
| Tuta |
4776
4644
|
3789
3839
|
916
749
|
104
93
|
79.33 %
82.67 %
|
19.18 %
16.13 %
|
2.18 %
2.00 %
|
| Juno.com |
4787
4640
|
3838
3787
|
885
768
|
113
97
|
80.18 %
81.62 %
|
18.49 %
16.55 %
|
2.36 %
2.09 %
|
| Mailfence |
2983
3104
|
2360
2497
|
558
547
|
65
60
|
79.11 %
80.44 %
|
18.71 %
17.62 %
|
2.18 %
1.93 %
|
Compare CampaignMonitor with other providers
Compare the email deliverability of CampaignMonitor with other providers.
- CampaignMonitor and ActiveCampaign comparison
- CampaignMonitor and Amazon SES comparison
- CampaignMonitor and AWeber comparison
- CampaignMonitor and Benchmark Email comparison
- CampaignMonitor and Brevo comparison
- CampaignMonitor and Clever Elements comparison
- CampaignMonitor and CleverReach comparison
- CampaignMonitor and Constant Contact comparison
- CampaignMonitor and ConvertKit comparison
- CampaignMonitor and GetResponse comparison
- CampaignMonitor and HubSpot comparison
- CampaignMonitor and Kit comparison
- CampaignMonitor and Klick-Tipp comparison
- CampaignMonitor and MailChimp comparison
- CampaignMonitor and MailerLite comparison
- CampaignMonitor and Mailgun comparison
- CampaignMonitor and Mailify comparison
- CampaignMonitor and Mailjet comparison
- CampaignMonitor and mailtrap comparison
- CampaignMonitor and Moosend comparison
- CampaignMonitor and Newsletter2Go comparison
- CampaignMonitor and Postmark comparison
- CampaignMonitor and Rapidmail comparison
- CampaignMonitor and Sarbacane comparison
- CampaignMonitor and SendGrid comparison
- CampaignMonitor and SendInBlue comparison
- CampaignMonitor and SendPulse comparison
Deutsch
English
Русский