Benchmark Email and CampaignMonitor Email Deliverability Comparison
In this comparison, the deliverability of Benchmark Email and CampaignMonitor is compared in detail. All available data, taking the filters into account, is used for the comparison.
Email deliverability
This comparison compares the numbers for sent emails, you can also see in which folder the emails at the email service provider ended up and how many emails were lost on the way. The numbers look better for Benchmark Email than for CampaignMonitor.
| Emails Sent | Emails Inbox | Emails Spam | Emails Lost |
|---|---|---|---|
|
64.256
63.889
|
51.984
50.007
|
11.432
12.907
|
1.289
1.400
|
Email deliverability rates
The following table shows the most important deliverability rates (in percent) for the compared providers. The higher the inbox rate and the lower the spam rate, the better. Benchmark Email beats CampaignMonitor in this comparison.
| Inbox (%) | Spam (%) | Lost (%) |
|---|---|---|
|
80.90 %
78.27 %
|
17.79 %
20.20 %
|
2.01 %
2.19 %
|
Email deliverability by category
This comparison compares the deliverability taking into account the category or the industry. The deliverability can vary greatly depending on the industry. In this comparison, Benchmark Email is the clear winner.
| Category | Emails Sent | Emails Inbox | Emails Spam | Emails Lost | Inbox (%) | Spam (%) | Lost (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clothing |
5017
5227
|
3990
4110
|
947
1055
|
97
115
|
79.53 %
78.63 %
|
18.88 %
20.18 %
|
1.93 %
2.20 %
|
| Elektronics |
4959
5047
|
4054
3909
|
838
1037
|
112
107
|
81.75 %
77.45 %
|
16.90 %
20.55 %
|
2.26 %
2.12 %
|
| Entertainment |
5054
4880
|
4088
3801
|
905
959
|
100
101
|
80.89 %
77.89 %
|
17.91 %
19.65 %
|
1.98 %
2.07 %
|
| Cosmetics & Beauty |
4874
4956
|
3977
3932
|
852
968
|
96
105
|
81.60 %
79.34 %
|
17.48 %
19.53 %
|
1.97 %
2.12 %
|
| Food & Drink |
4756
4941
|
3832
3836
|
873
1023
|
99
106
|
80.57 %
77.64 %
|
18.36 %
20.70 %
|
2.08 %
2.15 %
|
| Home & Garden |
4986
4849
|
4050
3782
|
881
1024
|
103
108
|
81.23 %
78.00 %
|
17.67 %
21.12 %
|
2.07 %
2.23 %
|
| Finance |
4816
4989
|
3968
4007
|
772
914
|
107
116
|
82.39 %
80.32 %
|
16.03 %
18.32 %
|
2.22 %
2.33 %
|
| Health |
4962
4749
|
4116
3852
|
768
833
|
90
105
|
82.95 %
81.11 %
|
15.48 %
17.54 %
|
1.81 %
2.21 %
|
| Pets |
5128
4871
|
4149
3794
|
903
1001
|
97
112
|
80.91 %
77.89 %
|
17.61 %
20.55 %
|
1.89 %
2.30 %
|
| Sport & Fitness |
4893
5068
|
3945
3929
|
878
1047
|
92
108
|
80.63 %
77.53 %
|
17.94 %
20.66 %
|
1.88 %
2.13 %
|
| Job & Career |
4916
4707
|
3906
3617
|
949
1015
|
104
107
|
79.45 %
76.84 %
|
19.30 %
21.56 %
|
2.12 %
2.27 %
|
| Dating |
4920
4857
|
3850
3680
|
1022
1104
|
94
111
|
78.25 %
75.77 %
|
20.77 %
22.73 %
|
1.91 %
2.29 %
|
| Other |
4975
4748
|
4059
3758
|
844
927
|
98
99
|
81.59 %
79.15 %
|
16.96 %
19.52 %
|
1.97 %
2.09 %
|
Email deliverability by email service provider
Finally, the following table compares the deliverability taking into account the email service provider. Similar to the industry, also the email service provider can affect the email deliverability in both directions — positive or negative. In this comparison, Benchmark Email is better than CampaignMonitor.
| Provider | Emails Sent | Emails Inbox | Emails Spam | Emails Lost | Inbox (%) | Spam (%) | Lost (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gmail |
4670
4456
|
3698
3380
|
936
1011
|
91
96
|
79.19 %
75.85 %
|
20.04 %
22.69 %
|
1.95 %
2.15 %
|
| Outlook Mail |
4924
4614
|
3941
3544
|
926
1000
|
96
108
|
80.04 %
76.81 %
|
18.81 %
21.67 %
|
1.95 %
2.34 %
|
| Yahoo Mail |
4688
4702
|
3774
3633
|
856
965
|
95
101
|
80.50 %
77.26 %
|
18.26 %
20.52 %
|
2.03 %
2.15 %
|
| AOL Mail |
4499
4805
|
3634
3702
|
807
1019
|
92
105
|
80.77 %
77.04 %
|
17.94 %
21.21 %
|
2.04 %
2.19 %
|
| Mail.com |
4687
4686
|
3838
3685
|
802
921
|
95
95
|
81.89 %
78.64 %
|
17.11 %
19.65 %
|
2.03 %
2.03 %
|
| Yandex Mail |
4988
4614
|
4005
3602
|
898
971
|
97
98
|
80.29 %
78.07 %
|
18.00 %
21.04 %
|
1.94 %
2.12 %
|
| GMX Mail |
4755
4668
|
3794
3609
|
931
973
|
89
97
|
79.79 %
77.31 %
|
19.58 %
20.84 %
|
1.87 %
2.08 %
|
| Zoho Mail |
4609
4755
|
3770
3801
|
755
894
|
97
104
|
81.80 %
79.94 %
|
16.38 %
18.80 %
|
2.10 %
2.19 %
|
| ProtonMail |
4768
4645
|
3915
3715
|
781
880
|
101
106
|
82.11 %
79.98 %
|
16.38 %
18.95 %
|
2.12 %
2.28 %
|
| Custom Mail |
4523
4689
|
3760
3784
|
699
846
|
86
101
|
83.13 %
80.70 %
|
15.45 %
18.04 %
|
1.90 %
2.15 %
|
| iCloud Mail |
4757
4709
|
3732
3565
|
977
1068
|
100
107
|
78.45 %
75.71 %
|
20.54 %
22.68 %
|
2.10 %
2.27 %
|
| Tuta |
4644
4776
|
3839
3789
|
749
916
|
93
104
|
82.67 %
79.33 %
|
16.13 %
19.18 %
|
2.00 %
2.18 %
|
| Juno.com |
4640
4787
|
3787
3838
|
768
885
|
97
113
|
81.62 %
80.18 %
|
16.55 %
18.49 %
|
2.09 %
2.36 %
|
| Mailfence |
3104
2983
|
2497
2360
|
547
558
|
60
65
|
80.44 %
79.11 %
|
17.62 %
18.71 %
|
1.93 %
2.18 %
|
Compare Benchmark Email with other providers
Compare the email deliverability of Benchmark Email with other providers.
- Benchmark Email and ActiveCampaign comparison
- Benchmark Email and Amazon SES comparison
- Benchmark Email and AWeber comparison
- Benchmark Email and Brevo comparison
- Benchmark Email and CampaignMonitor comparison
- Benchmark Email and Clever Elements comparison
- Benchmark Email and CleverReach comparison
- Benchmark Email and Constant Contact comparison
- Benchmark Email and ConvertKit comparison
- Benchmark Email and GetResponse comparison
- Benchmark Email and HubSpot comparison
- Benchmark Email and Kit comparison
- Benchmark Email and Klick-Tipp comparison
- Benchmark Email and MailChimp comparison
- Benchmark Email and MailerLite comparison
- Benchmark Email and Mailgun comparison
- Benchmark Email and Mailify comparison
- Benchmark Email and Mailjet comparison
- Benchmark Email and mailtrap comparison
- Benchmark Email and Moosend comparison
- Benchmark Email and Newsletter2Go comparison
- Benchmark Email and Postmark comparison
- Benchmark Email and Rapidmail comparison
- Benchmark Email and Sarbacane comparison
- Benchmark Email and SendGrid comparison
- Benchmark Email and SendInBlue comparison
- Benchmark Email and SendPulse comparison
Deutsch
English
Русский