Benchmark Email and MailerLite Email Deliverability Comparison
In this comparison, the deliverability of Benchmark Email and MailerLite is compared in detail. All available data, taking the filters into account, is used for the comparison.
Email deliverability
This comparison compares the numbers for sent emails, you can also see in which folder the emails at the email service provider ended up and how many emails were lost on the way. The numbers look better for Benchmark Email than for MailerLite.
Emails Sent | Emails Inbox | Emails Spam | Emails Lost |
---|---|---|---|
439.266
437.416
|
333.419
329.481
|
88.752
90.984
|
17.095
16.951
|
Email deliverability rates
The following table shows the most important deliverability rates (in percent) for the compared providers. The higher the inbox rate and the lower the spam rate, the better. Benchmark Email beats MailerLite in this comparison.
Inbox (%) | Spam (%) | Lost (%) |
---|---|---|
75.90 %
75.32 %
|
20.20 %
20.80 %
|
3.89 %
3.88 %
|
Email deliverability by category
This comparison compares the deliverability taking into account the category or the industry. The deliverability can vary greatly depending on the industry. In this comparison, Benchmark Email is the clear winner.
Category | Emails Sent | Emails Inbox | Emails Spam | Emails Lost | Inbox (%) | Spam (%) | Lost (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Clothing |
33603
33633
|
26519
26296
|
5880
6156
|
1204
1181
|
78.92 %
78.19 %
|
17.50 %
18.30 %
|
3.58 %
3.51 %
|
Elektronics |
34087
33067
|
26011
25160
|
6791
6626
|
1285
1281
|
76.31 %
76.09 %
|
19.92 %
20.04 %
|
3.77 %
3.87 %
|
Entertainment |
33356
33409
|
25365
25210
|
6709
6969
|
1282
1230
|
76.04 %
75.46 %
|
20.11 %
20.86 %
|
3.84 %
3.68 %
|
Cosmetics & Beauty |
33565
33960
|
25450
25482
|
6805
7148
|
1310
1330
|
75.82 %
75.04 %
|
20.27 %
21.05 %
|
3.90 %
3.92 %
|
Food & Drink |
33735
33869
|
26600
26477
|
5940
6211
|
1195
1181
|
78.85 %
78.17 %
|
17.61 %
18.34 %
|
3.54 %
3.49 %
|
Home & Garden |
34029
33702
|
26913
26380
|
5938
6105
|
1178
1217
|
79.09 %
78.27 %
|
17.45 %
18.11 %
|
3.46 %
3.61 %
|
Finance |
34003
34196
|
24647
24579
|
7889
8119
|
1467
1498
|
72.48 %
71.88 %
|
23.20 %
23.74 %
|
4.31 %
4.38 %
|
Health |
34316
33761
|
25157
24613
|
7770
7808
|
1389
1340
|
73.31 %
72.90 %
|
22.64 %
23.13 %
|
4.05 %
3.97 %
|
Pets |
33884
33650
|
26449
26030
|
6233
6397
|
1202
1223
|
78.06 %
77.36 %
|
18.40 %
19.01 %
|
3.55 %
3.63 %
|
Sport & Fitness |
32992
33697
|
24767
24975
|
6889
7388
|
1336
1334
|
75.07 %
74.12 %
|
20.88 %
21.92 %
|
4.05 %
3.96 %
|
Job & Career |
34201
33798
|
25217
24807
|
7465
7583
|
1519
1408
|
73.73 %
73.40 %
|
21.83 %
22.44 %
|
4.44 %
4.17 %
|
Dating |
33728
33250
|
24063
23583
|
8223
8193
|
1442
1474
|
71.34 %
70.93 %
|
24.38 %
24.64 %
|
4.28 %
4.43 %
|
Other |
33767
33424
|
26261
25889
|
6220
6281
|
1286
1254
|
77.77 %
77.46 %
|
18.42 %
18.79 %
|
3.81 %
3.75 %
|
Email deliverability by email service provider
Finally, the following table compares the deliverability taking into account the email service provider. Similar to the industry, also the email service provider can affect the email deliverability in both directions – positive or negative. In this comparison, Benchmark Email is better than MailerLite.
Provider | Emails Sent | Emails Inbox | Emails Spam | Emails Lost | Inbox (%) | Spam (%) | Lost (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gmail |
42586
42689
|
30864
30666
|
9849
10156
|
1873
1867
|
72.47 %
71.84 %
|
23.13 %
23.79 %
|
4.40 %
4.37 %
|
Outlook Mail |
43114
43000
|
31460
31337
|
9826
9886
|
1828
1777
|
72.97 %
72.88 %
|
22.79 %
22.99 %
|
4.24 %
4.13 %
|
Yahoo Mail |
42866
42602
|
32416
31885
|
8733
8997
|
1717
1720
|
75.62 %
74.84 %
|
20.37 %
21.12 %
|
4.01 %
4.04 %
|
AOL Mail |
43079
42494
|
32512
31852
|
8852
8983
|
1715
1659
|
75.47 %
74.96 %
|
20.55 %
21.14 %
|
3.98 %
3.90 %
|
Mail.com |
43174
42966
|
33131
32673
|
8423
8651
|
1620
1642
|
76.74 %
76.04 %
|
19.51 %
20.13 %
|
3.75 %
3.82 %
|
Yandex Mail |
42806
42282
|
31653
31171
|
9347
9402
|
1806
1709
|
73.95 %
73.72 %
|
21.84 %
22.24 %
|
4.22 %
4.04 %
|
GMX Mail |
43062
42859
|
32994
32630
|
8590
8704
|
1478
1525
|
76.62 %
76.13 %
|
19.95 %
20.31 %
|
3.43 %
3.56 %
|
Zoho Mail |
42823
42621
|
33158
32915
|
8040
8178
|
1625
1528
|
77.43 %
77.23 %
|
18.77 %
19.19 %
|
3.79 %
3.59 %
|
ProtonMail |
42664
42689
|
33118
32934
|
8018
8292
|
1528
1463
|
77.63 %
77.15 %
|
18.79 %
19.42 %
|
3.58 %
3.43 %
|
Custom Mail |
42719
43034
|
33655
33615
|
7552
7894
|
1512
1525
|
78.78 %
78.11 %
|
17.68 %
18.34 %
|
3.54 %
3.54 %
|
iCloud Mail |
3408
3440
|
2616
2473
|
627
751
|
165
216
|
76.76 %
71.89 %
|
18.40 %
21.83 %
|
4.84 %
6.28 %
|
Tuta |
3421
3392
|
2865
2696
|
448
554
|
108
142
|
83.75 %
79.48 %
|
13.10 %
16.33 %
|
3.16 %
4.19 %
|
Juno.com |
3544
3348
|
2977
2634
|
447
536
|
120
178
|
84.00 %
78.67 %
|
12.61 %
16.01 %
|
3.39 %
5.32 %
|
Compare Benchmark Email with other providers
Compare the email deliverability of Benchmark Email with other providers.
- Benchmark Email and ActiveCampaign comparison
- Benchmark Email and Amazon SES comparison
- Benchmark Email and AWeber comparison
- Benchmark Email and Brevo comparison
- Benchmark Email and CampaignMonitor comparison
- Benchmark Email and Clever Elements comparison
- Benchmark Email and CleverReach comparison
- Benchmark Email and Constant Contact comparison
- Benchmark Email and ConvertKit comparison
- Benchmark Email and GetResponse comparison
- Benchmark Email and HubSpot comparison
- Benchmark Email and Kit comparison
- Benchmark Email and Klick-Tipp comparison
- Benchmark Email and MailChimp comparison
- Benchmark Email and MailerLite comparison
- Benchmark Email and Mailgun comparison
- Benchmark Email and Mailify comparison
- Benchmark Email and Mailjet comparison
- Benchmark Email and mailtrap comparison
- Benchmark Email and Moosend comparison
- Benchmark Email and Newsletter2Go comparison
- Benchmark Email and Postmark comparison
- Benchmark Email and Rapidmail comparison
- Benchmark Email and Sarbacane comparison
- Benchmark Email and SendGrid comparison
- Benchmark Email and SendInBlue comparison
- Benchmark Email and SendPulse comparison