Constant Contact and Postmark Email Deliverability Comparison
In this comparison, the deliverability of Constant Contact and Postmark is compared in detail. All available data, taking the filters into account, is used for the comparison.
Email deliverability
This comparison compares the numbers for sent emails, you can also see in which folder the emails at the email service provider ended up and how many emails were lost on the way. The numbers look better for Postmark than for Constant Contact.
| Emails Sent | Emails Inbox | Emails Spam | Emails Lost |
|---|---|---|---|
|
63.973
63.445
|
50.112
50.822
|
12.784
11.778
|
1.666
1.354
|
Email deliverability rates
The following table shows the most important deliverability rates (in percent) for the compared providers. The higher the inbox rate and the lower the spam rate, the better. Postmark beats Constant Contact in this comparison.
| Inbox (%) | Spam (%) | Lost (%) |
|---|---|---|
|
78.33 %
80.10 %
|
19.98 %
18.56 %
|
2.60 %
2.13 %
|
Email deliverability by category
This comparison compares the deliverability taking into account the category or the industry. The deliverability can vary greatly depending on the industry. In this comparison, Postmark is the clear winner.
| Category | Emails Sent | Emails Inbox | Emails Spam | Emails Lost | Inbox (%) | Spam (%) | Lost (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clothing |
4680
4784
|
3647
3827
|
974
896
|
124
102
|
77.93 %
80.00 %
|
20.81 %
18.73 %
|
2.65 %
2.13 %
|
| Elektronics |
4774
4743
|
3773
3808
|
914
875
|
123
101
|
79.03 %
80.29 %
|
19.15 %
18.45 %
|
2.58 %
2.13 %
|
| Entertainment |
5102
5083
|
3988
4042
|
1000
963
|
132
120
|
78.17 %
79.52 %
|
19.60 %
18.95 %
|
2.59 %
2.36 %
|
| Cosmetics & Beauty |
4883
4728
|
3826
3806
|
990
876
|
129
96
|
78.35 %
80.50 %
|
20.27 %
18.53 %
|
2.64 %
2.03 %
|
| Food & Drink |
4863
4798
|
3797
3836
|
1008
913
|
118
93
|
78.08 %
79.95 %
|
20.73 %
19.03 %
|
2.43 %
1.94 %
|
| Home & Garden |
4976
4796
|
3888
3857
|
1016
863
|
127
104
|
78.14 %
80.42 %
|
20.42 %
17.99 %
|
2.55 %
2.17 %
|
| Finance |
4956
4978
|
4015
4085
|
842
845
|
140
103
|
81.01 %
82.06 %
|
16.99 %
16.97 %
|
2.82 %
2.07 %
|
| Health |
4983
4709
|
4004
3895
|
896
721
|
132
98
|
80.35 %
82.71 %
|
17.98 %
15.31 %
|
2.65 %
2.08 %
|
| Pets |
4968
4983
|
3895
3962
|
981
938
|
132
113
|
78.40 %
79.51 %
|
19.75 %
18.82 %
|
2.66 %
2.27 %
|
| Sport & Fitness |
4949
5096
|
3848
4048
|
1006
976
|
133
108
|
77.75 %
79.43 %
|
20.33 %
19.15 %
|
2.69 %
2.12 %
|
| Job & Career |
5031
4854
|
3865
3814
|
1084
983
|
130
101
|
76.82 %
78.57 %
|
21.55 %
20.25 %
|
2.58 %
2.08 %
|
| Dating |
4880
4857
|
3655
3741
|
1140
1049
|
122
103
|
74.90 %
77.02 %
|
23.36 %
21.60 %
|
2.50 %
2.12 %
|
| Other |
4928
5036
|
3911
4101
|
933
880
|
124
112
|
79.36 %
81.43 %
|
18.93 %
17.47 %
|
2.52 %
2.22 %
|
Email deliverability by email service provider
Finally, the following table compares the deliverability taking into account the email service provider. Similar to the industry, also the email service provider can affect the email deliverability in both directions — positive or negative. In this comparison, Postmark is better than Constant Contact.
| Provider | Emails Sent | Emails Inbox | Emails Spam | Emails Lost | Inbox (%) | Spam (%) | Lost (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gmail |
4709
4638
|
3594
3591
|
1032
1000
|
117
93
|
76.32 %
77.43 %
|
21.92 %
21.56 %
|
2.48 %
2.01 %
|
| Outlook Mail |
4505
4562
|
3463
3585
|
966
909
|
120
101
|
76.87 %
78.58 %
|
21.44 %
19.93 %
|
2.66 %
2.21 %
|
| Yahoo Mail |
4762
4625
|
3699
3657
|
1007
908
|
124
101
|
77.68 %
79.07 %
|
21.15 %
19.63 %
|
2.60 %
2.18 %
|
| AOL Mail |
4603
4633
|
3576
3688
|
946
873
|
121
95
|
77.69 %
79.60 %
|
20.55 %
18.84 %
|
2.63 %
2.05 %
|
| Mail.com |
4887
4620
|
3873
3772
|
937
766
|
128
97
|
79.25 %
81.65 %
|
19.17 %
16.58 %
|
2.62 %
2.10 %
|
| Yandex Mail |
4565
4706
|
3565
3758
|
953
882
|
126
101
|
78.09 %
79.86 %
|
20.88 %
18.74 %
|
2.76 %
2.15 %
|
| GMX Mail |
4561
4690
|
3484
3679
|
986
928
|
115
111
|
76.39 %
78.44 %
|
21.62 %
19.79 %
|
2.52 %
2.37 %
|
| Zoho Mail |
4795
4704
|
3814
3835
|
899
817
|
127
99
|
79.54 %
81.53 %
|
18.75 %
17.37 %
|
2.65 %
2.10 %
|
| ProtonMail |
4616
4536
|
3720
3702
|
833
801
|
116
94
|
80.59 %
81.61 %
|
18.05 %
17.66 %
|
2.51 %
2.07 %
|
| Custom Mail |
4732
4667
|
3784
3866
|
865
748
|
126
103
|
79.97 %
82.84 %
|
18.28 %
16.03 %
|
2.66 %
2.21 %
|
| iCloud Mail |
4639
4614
|
3554
3582
|
1020
966
|
125
99
|
76.61 %
77.63 %
|
21.99 %
20.94 %
|
2.69 %
2.15 %
|
| Tuta |
4582
4645
|
3641
3785
|
861
801
|
117
99
|
79.46 %
81.49 %
|
18.79 %
17.24 %
|
2.55 %
2.13 %
|
| Juno.com |
4724
4779
|
3767
3901
|
848
834
|
120
101
|
79.74 %
81.63 %
|
17.95 %
17.45 %
|
2.54 %
2.11 %
|
| Mailfence |
3293
3026
|
2578
2421
|
631
545
|
84
60
|
78.29 %
80.01 %
|
19.16 %
18.01 %
|
2.55 %
1.98 %
|
Compare Constant Contact with other providers
Compare the email deliverability of Constant Contact with other providers.
- Constant Contact and ActiveCampaign comparison
- Constant Contact and Amazon SES comparison
- Constant Contact and AWeber comparison
- Constant Contact and Benchmark Email comparison
- Constant Contact and Brevo comparison
- Constant Contact and CampaignMonitor comparison
- Constant Contact and Clever Elements comparison
- Constant Contact and CleverReach comparison
- Constant Contact and ConvertKit comparison
- Constant Contact and GetResponse comparison
- Constant Contact and HubSpot comparison
- Constant Contact and Kit comparison
- Constant Contact and Klick-Tipp comparison
- Constant Contact and MailChimp comparison
- Constant Contact and MailerLite comparison
- Constant Contact and Mailgun comparison
- Constant Contact and Mailify comparison
- Constant Contact and Mailjet comparison
- Constant Contact and mailtrap comparison
- Constant Contact and Moosend comparison
- Constant Contact and Newsletter2Go comparison
- Constant Contact and Postmark comparison
- Constant Contact and Rapidmail comparison
- Constant Contact and Sarbacane comparison
- Constant Contact and SendGrid comparison
- Constant Contact and SendInBlue comparison
- Constant Contact and SendPulse comparison
Deutsch
English
Русский