Constant Contact and mailtrap Email Deliverability Comparison
In this comparison, the deliverability of Constant Contact and mailtrap is compared in detail. All available data, taking the filters into account, is used for the comparison.
Email deliverability
This comparison compares the numbers for sent emails, you can also see in which folder the emails at the email service provider ended up and how many emails were lost on the way. The numbers look better for mailtrap than for Constant Contact.
| Emails Sent | Emails Inbox | Emails Spam | Emails Lost |
|---|---|---|---|
|
63.973
63.318
|
50.112
50.377
|
12.784
12.086
|
1.666
1.393
|
Email deliverability rates
The following table shows the most important deliverability rates (in percent) for the compared providers. The higher the inbox rate and the lower the spam rate, the better. mailtrap beats Constant Contact in this comparison.
| Inbox (%) | Spam (%) | Lost (%) |
|---|---|---|
|
78.33 %
79.56 %
|
19.98 %
19.09 %
|
2.60 %
2.20 %
|
Email deliverability by category
This comparison compares the deliverability taking into account the category or the industry. The deliverability can vary greatly depending on the industry. In this comparison, mailtrap is the clear winner.
| Category | Emails Sent | Emails Inbox | Emails Spam | Emails Lost | Inbox (%) | Spam (%) | Lost (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clothing |
4680
4783
|
3647
3791
|
974
902
|
124
100
|
77.93 %
79.26 %
|
20.81 %
18.86 %
|
2.65 %
2.09 %
|
| Elektronics |
4774
4905
|
3773
3933
|
914
904
|
123
102
|
79.03 %
80.18 %
|
19.15 %
18.43 %
|
2.58 %
2.08 %
|
| Entertainment |
5102
4998
|
3988
3975
|
1000
980
|
132
101
|
78.17 %
79.53 %
|
19.60 %
19.61 %
|
2.59 %
2.02 %
|
| Cosmetics & Beauty |
4883
4737
|
3826
3770
|
990
882
|
129
116
|
78.35 %
79.59 %
|
20.27 %
18.62 %
|
2.64 %
2.45 %
|
| Food & Drink |
4863
4617
|
3797
3647
|
1008
912
|
118
95
|
78.08 %
78.99 %
|
20.73 %
19.75 %
|
2.43 %
2.06 %
|
| Home & Garden |
4976
4836
|
3888
3828
|
1016
944
|
127
116
|
78.14 %
79.16 %
|
20.42 %
19.52 %
|
2.55 %
2.40 %
|
| Finance |
4956
4687
|
4015
3831
|
842
785
|
140
99
|
81.01 %
81.74 %
|
16.99 %
16.75 %
|
2.82 %
2.11 %
|
| Health |
4983
5034
|
4004
4112
|
896
854
|
132
109
|
80.35 %
81.68 %
|
17.98 %
16.96 %
|
2.65 %
2.17 %
|
| Pets |
4968
4993
|
3895
3976
|
981
962
|
132
111
|
78.40 %
79.63 %
|
19.75 %
19.27 %
|
2.66 %
2.22 %
|
| Sport & Fitness |
4949
4969
|
3848
3933
|
1006
953
|
133
107
|
77.75 %
79.15 %
|
20.33 %
19.18 %
|
2.69 %
2.15 %
|
| Job & Career |
5031
5014
|
3865
3909
|
1084
1040
|
130
115
|
76.82 %
77.96 %
|
21.55 %
20.74 %
|
2.58 %
2.29 %
|
| Dating |
4880
4912
|
3655
3761
|
1140
1093
|
122
117
|
74.90 %
76.57 %
|
23.36 %
22.25 %
|
2.50 %
2.38 %
|
| Other |
4928
4833
|
3911
3911
|
933
875
|
124
105
|
79.36 %
80.92 %
|
18.93 %
18.10 %
|
2.52 %
2.17 %
|
Email deliverability by email service provider
Finally, the following table compares the deliverability taking into account the email service provider. Similar to the industry, also the email service provider can affect the email deliverability in both directions — positive or negative. In this comparison, mailtrap is better than Constant Contact.
| Provider | Emails Sent | Emails Inbox | Emails Spam | Emails Lost | Inbox (%) | Spam (%) | Lost (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gmail |
4709
4582
|
3594
3539
|
1032
991
|
117
114
|
76.32 %
77.24 %
|
21.92 %
21.63 %
|
2.48 %
2.49 %
|
| Outlook Mail |
4505
4660
|
3463
3641
|
966
978
|
120
99
|
76.87 %
78.13 %
|
21.44 %
20.99 %
|
2.66 %
2.12 %
|
| Yahoo Mail |
4762
4753
|
3699
3765
|
1007
927
|
124
111
|
77.68 %
79.21 %
|
21.15 %
19.50 %
|
2.60 %
2.34 %
|
| AOL Mail |
4603
4566
|
3576
3627
|
946
882
|
121
100
|
77.69 %
79.43 %
|
20.55 %
19.32 %
|
2.63 %
2.19 %
|
| Mail.com |
4887
4696
|
3873
3790
|
937
847
|
128
97
|
79.25 %
80.71 %
|
19.17 %
18.04 %
|
2.62 %
2.07 %
|
| Yandex Mail |
4565
4585
|
3565
3632
|
953
904
|
126
101
|
78.09 %
79.21 %
|
20.88 %
19.72 %
|
2.76 %
2.20 %
|
| GMX Mail |
4561
4760
|
3484
3773
|
986
937
|
115
107
|
76.39 %
79.26 %
|
21.62 %
19.68 %
|
2.52 %
2.25 %
|
| Zoho Mail |
4795
4625
|
3814
3700
|
899
857
|
127
95
|
79.54 %
80.00 %
|
18.75 %
18.53 %
|
2.65 %
2.05 %
|
| ProtonMail |
4616
4507
|
3720
3646
|
833
787
|
116
97
|
80.59 %
80.90 %
|
18.05 %
17.46 %
|
2.51 %
2.15 %
|
| Custom Mail |
4732
4804
|
3784
3904
|
865
846
|
126
106
|
79.97 %
81.27 %
|
18.28 %
17.61 %
|
2.66 %
2.21 %
|
| iCloud Mail |
4639
4565
|
3554
3542
|
1020
943
|
125
103
|
76.61 %
77.59 %
|
21.99 %
20.66 %
|
2.69 %
2.26 %
|
| Tuta |
4582
4525
|
3641
3641
|
861
803
|
117
99
|
79.46 %
80.46 %
|
18.79 %
17.75 %
|
2.55 %
2.19 %
|
| Juno.com |
4724
4631
|
3767
3746
|
848
817
|
120
103
|
79.74 %
80.89 %
|
17.95 %
17.64 %
|
2.54 %
2.22 %
|
| Mailfence |
3293
3059
|
2578
2431
|
631
567
|
84
61
|
78.29 %
79.47 %
|
19.16 %
18.54 %
|
2.55 %
1.99 %
|
Compare Constant Contact with other providers
Compare the email deliverability of Constant Contact with other providers.
- Constant Contact and ActiveCampaign comparison
- Constant Contact and Amazon SES comparison
- Constant Contact and AWeber comparison
- Constant Contact and Benchmark Email comparison
- Constant Contact and Brevo comparison
- Constant Contact and CampaignMonitor comparison
- Constant Contact and Clever Elements comparison
- Constant Contact and CleverReach comparison
- Constant Contact and ConvertKit comparison
- Constant Contact and GetResponse comparison
- Constant Contact and HubSpot comparison
- Constant Contact and Kit comparison
- Constant Contact and Klick-Tipp comparison
- Constant Contact and MailChimp comparison
- Constant Contact and MailerLite comparison
- Constant Contact and Mailgun comparison
- Constant Contact and Mailify comparison
- Constant Contact and Mailjet comparison
- Constant Contact and mailtrap comparison
- Constant Contact and Moosend comparison
- Constant Contact and Newsletter2Go comparison
- Constant Contact and Postmark comparison
- Constant Contact and Rapidmail comparison
- Constant Contact and Sarbacane comparison
- Constant Contact and SendGrid comparison
- Constant Contact and SendInBlue comparison
- Constant Contact and SendPulse comparison
Deutsch
English
Русский