Constant Contact and Mailjet Email Deliverability Comparison
In this comparison, the deliverability of Constant Contact and Mailjet is compared in detail. All available data, taking the filters into account, is used for the comparison.
Email deliverability
This comparison compares the numbers for sent emails, you can also see in which folder the emails at the email service provider ended up and how many emails were lost on the way. The numbers look better for Mailjet than for Constant Contact.
Emails Sent | Emails Inbox | Emails Spam | Emails Lost |
---|---|---|---|
438.027
438.019
|
330.244
348.262
|
90.425
76.745
|
17.358
13.012
|
Email deliverability rates
The following table shows the most important deliverability rates (in percent) for the compared providers. The higher the inbox rate and the lower the spam rate, the better. Mailjet beats Constant Contact in this comparison.
Inbox (%) | Spam (%) | Lost (%) |
---|---|---|
75.39 %
79.51 %
|
20.64 %
17.52 %
|
3.96 %
2.97 %
|
Email deliverability by category
This comparison compares the deliverability taking into account the category or the industry. The deliverability can vary greatly depending on the industry. In this comparison, Mailjet is the clear winner.
Category | Emails Sent | Emails Inbox | Emails Spam | Emails Lost | Inbox (%) | Spam (%) | Lost (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Clothing |
33667
33358
|
26349
27594
|
6066
4877
|
1252
887
|
78.26 %
82.72 %
|
18.02 %
14.62 %
|
3.72 %
2.66 %
|
Elektronics |
33415
33696
|
25454
27031
|
6709
5728
|
1252
937
|
76.18 %
80.22 %
|
20.08 %
17.00 %
|
3.75 %
2.78 %
|
Entertainment |
33654
33364
|
25335
26523
|
6954
5877
|
1365
964
|
75.28 %
79.50 %
|
20.66 %
17.61 %
|
4.06 %
2.89 %
|
Cosmetics & Beauty |
33691
33908
|
25389
26923
|
6984
5969
|
1318
1016
|
75.36 %
79.40 %
|
20.73 %
17.60 %
|
3.91 %
3.00 %
|
Food & Drink |
33730
33580
|
26488
27659
|
6044
5067
|
1198
854
|
78.53 %
82.37 %
|
17.92 %
15.09 %
|
3.55 %
2.54 %
|
Home & Garden |
33744
33611
|
26361
27734
|
6115
5023
|
1268
854
|
78.12 %
82.51 %
|
18.12 %
14.94 %
|
3.76 %
2.54 %
|
Finance |
34034
33805
|
24516
25711
|
8084
6926
|
1434
1168
|
72.03 %
76.06 %
|
23.75 %
20.49 %
|
4.21 %
3.46 %
|
Health |
33220
33768
|
24247
25990
|
7604
6694
|
1369
1084
|
72.99 %
76.97 %
|
22.89 %
19.82 %
|
4.12 %
3.21 %
|
Pets |
34152
33812
|
26407
27645
|
6455
5248
|
1290
919
|
77.32 %
81.76 %
|
18.90 %
15.52 %
|
3.78 %
2.72 %
|
Sport & Fitness |
34038
33790
|
25245
26572
|
7395
6179
|
1398
1039
|
74.17 %
78.64 %
|
21.73 %
18.29 %
|
4.11 %
3.07 %
|
Job & Career |
33428
33687
|
24634
26026
|
7343
6496
|
1451
1165
|
73.69 %
77.26 %
|
21.97 %
19.28 %
|
4.34 %
3.46 %
|
Dating |
34008
33527
|
24034
25090
|
8468
7275
|
1506
1162
|
70.67 %
74.84 %
|
24.90 %
21.70 %
|
4.43 %
3.47 %
|
Other |
33246
34113
|
25785
27764
|
6204
5386
|
1257
963
|
77.56 %
81.39 %
|
18.66 %
15.79 %
|
3.78 %
2.82 %
|
Email deliverability by email service provider
Finally, the following table compares the deliverability taking into account the email service provider. Similar to the industry, also the email service provider can affect the email deliverability in both directions – positive or negative. In this comparison, Mailjet is better than Constant Contact.
Provider | Emails Sent | Emails Inbox | Emails Spam | Emails Lost | Inbox (%) | Spam (%) | Lost (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gmail |
42858
42551
|
30887
32409
|
10167
8719
|
1804
1423
|
72.07 %
76.17 %
|
23.72 %
20.49 %
|
4.21 %
3.34 %
|
Outlook Mail |
42630
42769
|
31015
32802
|
9740
8539
|
1875
1428
|
72.75 %
76.70 %
|
22.85 %
19.97 %
|
4.40 %
3.34 %
|
Yahoo Mail |
42656
42293
|
31978
33509
|
8946
7503
|
1732
1281
|
74.97 %
79.23 %
|
20.97 %
17.74 %
|
4.06 %
3.03 %
|
AOL Mail |
41862
42916
|
31371
33951
|
8692
7659
|
1799
1306
|
74.94 %
79.11 %
|
20.76 %
17.85 %
|
4.30 %
3.04 %
|
Mail.com |
43040
42938
|
32797
34545
|
8571
7191
|
1672
1202
|
76.20 %
80.45 %
|
19.91 %
16.75 %
|
3.88 %
2.80 %
|
Yandex Mail |
43141
42780
|
31731
33138
|
9594
8186
|
1816
1456
|
73.55 %
77.46 %
|
22.24 %
19.14 %
|
4.21 %
3.40 %
|
GMX Mail |
42456
43418
|
32271
34750
|
8603
7506
|
1582
1162
|
76.01 %
80.04 %
|
20.26 %
17.29 %
|
3.73 %
2.68 %
|
Zoho Mail |
42893
42142
|
33094
34261
|
8256
6732
|
1543
1149
|
77.15 %
81.30 %
|
19.25 %
15.97 %
|
3.60 %
2.73 %
|
ProtonMail |
43164
43037
|
33274
34933
|
8345
6982
|
1545
1122
|
77.09 %
81.17 %
|
19.33 %
16.22 %
|
3.58 %
2.61 %
|
Custom Mail |
43176
42712
|
33800
35080
|
7842
6494
|
1534
1138
|
78.28 %
82.13 %
|
18.16 %
15.20 %
|
3.55 %
2.66 %
|
iCloud Mail |
3319
3500
|
2465
2804
|
667
542
|
187
154
|
74.27 %
80.11 %
|
20.10 %
15.49 %
|
5.63 %
4.40 %
|
Tuta |
3385
3567
|
2739
3106
|
508
365
|
138
96
|
80.92 %
87.08 %
|
15.01 %
10.23 %
|
4.08 %
2.69 %
|
Juno.com |
3447
3396
|
2822
2974
|
494
327
|
131
95
|
81.87 %
87.57 %
|
14.33 %
9.63 %
|
3.80 %
2.80 %
|
Compare Constant Contact with other providers
Compare the email deliverability of Constant Contact with other providers.
- Constant Contact and ActiveCampaign comparison
- Constant Contact and Amazon SES comparison
- Constant Contact and AWeber comparison
- Constant Contact and Benchmark Email comparison
- Constant Contact and Brevo comparison
- Constant Contact and CampaignMonitor comparison
- Constant Contact and Clever Elements comparison
- Constant Contact and CleverReach comparison
- Constant Contact and ConvertKit comparison
- Constant Contact and GetResponse comparison
- Constant Contact and HubSpot comparison
- Constant Contact and Kit comparison
- Constant Contact and Klick-Tipp comparison
- Constant Contact and MailChimp comparison
- Constant Contact and MailerLite comparison
- Constant Contact and Mailgun comparison
- Constant Contact and Mailify comparison
- Constant Contact and Mailjet comparison
- Constant Contact and mailtrap comparison
- Constant Contact and Moosend comparison
- Constant Contact and Newsletter2Go comparison
- Constant Contact and Postmark comparison
- Constant Contact and Rapidmail comparison
- Constant Contact and Sarbacane comparison
- Constant Contact and SendGrid comparison
- Constant Contact and SendInBlue comparison
- Constant Contact and SendPulse comparison